PayPal
BitCoin
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon
RSS
iTunes

DoseNation Podcast

Weekly news, talk, and interviews. More »

SUGGEST A STORY  |   CREATE AN ACCOUNT  |  
DoseNation.com

UK government proposes to scrap need for scientific advice on drugs policy

Amendment removes requirement to appoint at least six scientists to Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs

Ministers will not be required to seek the advice of scientists when making drug classification policy in future, under new government proposals.

The police reform and social responsibility bill, published last week, contains an amendment to the constitution of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) that would remove the requirement on the home secretary to appoint at least six scientists to the committee.

A further amendment to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 would allow the home secretary to place temporary controls on substances for a year by statutory instrument.

The proposals will be of concern to the many doctors and scientists who have criticised the government's treatment of scientific evidence in the wake of the sacking, last year, of ACMD chairman David Nutt. The then home secretary, Alan Johnson, removed Nutt from the post after the scientist criticised politicians for distorting research evidence and claiming alcohol and tobacco were more harmful than some illegal drugs, including LSD, ecstasy and cannabis.

Posted By JamieBBlast at 2010-12-05 14:15:27 permalink | comments
Tags: UK David Nutt
Facebook it! Twitter it! Digg it! Reddit! StumbleUpon It! Google Bookmark del.icio.us technorati Furl Yahoo! Bookmark
» More ways to bookmark this page


slay : 2010-12-14 10:12:38
..soo. did anyone read the article or are we all just sheep that just decipher headlines? "The then home secretary, Alan Johnson, removed Nutt from the post after the scientist criticized politicians for distorting research evidence and claiming alcohol and tobacco were more harmful than some illegal drugs, including LSD, ecstasy and cannabis." ..CLAIMING [legal] drugs are worse than illegal ones. having said that, i have nothing left to say, and little hope left for mankind.
watchtheday. : 2010-12-11 13:53:28
@thenightwatch: of course it's not ok, then we lose one MORE sane person, and there's an even higher ratio of fuckheads to us. Stay around and help the fight.
?. : 2010-12-11 01:21:57
quantitative proof that i need me some 4-MTA
motley. : 2010-12-07 13:44:18
the prohabitionists can not win the scientific and medical argument so best bet is to get rid of them and then we can all continue with the drugs are bad refrain ~( except the legal ones of course)
what is also baffling is the present regime in the uk is intwent on reducing the prison popuation and what an effective tool the decriminlization of drugs would be.But will they consider it ? will they fuck.
thenightwatch. : 2010-12-06 21:20:34
sometimes i think that suicide is okay if you do it for the right reasons. not wanting to live in a word run by people that have ideas like this just might be one of those reasons.

oh well. fear of hell will always prevent me from going through with it. or maybe i'm already there? bahahaha... :)

love life everyone.

Nicko. : 2010-12-06 05:13:22
Somehow this story just doesn't surprise me at all
Wow. : 2010-12-05 14:31:39
This might just be the dumbest thing I've read in a long time. Its just pure stupidity on the UK's part. "We don't need science, it hasn't done anything productive for us, ever." Holy Sh*t this is amazing! Let's all just put our heads even deeper into our assholes.

The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.

HOME
COMMENTS
NEWS
ARCHIVE
EDITORS
REVIEW POLICY
SUGGEST A STORY
CREATE AN ACCOUNT
RSS | TWITTER | FACEBOOK
DIGG | REDDIT | SHARE