PayPal
BitCoin
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon
RSS
iTunes

DoseNation Podcast

Weekly news, talk, and interviews. More »

SUGGEST A STORY  |   CREATE AN ACCOUNT  |  
DoseNation.com

LEAP disinvited from federal conference on addiction

And in the "aww, can't we all just get along?" category, here's this item sent to us from Tom Angell at LEAP:

A group of police officers, judges and prosecutors who support legalizing and regulating drugs is crying foul after a federal agency reneged on a contract that gave the law enforcers a booth to share their anti-prohibition views at a government-sponsored treatment conference in Chicago next week.

After accepting registration payment from Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration initially told the police group that it was canceling its booth at the National Conference on Women, Addiction and Recovery because of overbooking and space concerns. However, Sharon Amatetti of SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Treatment later informed LEAP that, in a decision rising all the way to SAMHSA Administrator Pamela Hyde's office, the group was actually being disinvited for its viewpoint.

"It's alarming that the federal government is trying to silence the voices of front-line police officers who just want to network and collaborate with treatment professionals to achieve our shared goal of preventing substance abuse through effective public policy," said Neill Franklin, a former narcotics cop with the Maryland State Police and Baltimore Police Department who is now executive director of LEAP. "Perhaps the administration was most concerned that LEAP's law enforcers planned to shine a spotlight on the fact that under President Obama, the White House's drug control budget maintains the same two-to-one funding ratio in favor of harsh enforcement tactics over effective public health approaches."

On a phone call with LEAP, Pamela Rodriguez of conference co-host TASC, Inc. of Illinois said that the police group wasn't welcome at the event because "our policy perspective and our policy objectives are different from you guys." She added, "It is the emphasis on prohibition vs. legalization that, for me at least, is the glaring dissonance with regard to our agenda."

Posted By Scotto at 2010-07-22 18:52:20 permalink | comments
Tags: leap addiction prohibition legalization
Facebook it! Twitter it! Digg it! Reddit! StumbleUpon It! Google Bookmark del.icio.us technorati Furl Yahoo! Bookmark
» More ways to bookmark this page


Alex. : 2010-08-06 04:13:15
The glaring difference between the agenda of LEAP and that of TASC: LEAP is close to the problem of overcrowded prisons and drug prosecution leading o a cycle of crime, especially for poor minority groups, and wants to fix it. TASC makes money by selling the government fancy devices used to fight the war on drugs, and thus has a vested financial interest in prohibition. As for SAMHSA, however, they are just too short-sighted to understand how legalization helps remove the stigma and enables better access to better treatment. AA works well because alcohol is legal. I'm tired of seeing dipshits at every corner.
jmac. : 2010-07-23 20:21:21
Typical right wing agenda, silence the voice of those who know best. In my opinion who knows better than officers who have been on the front lines of this never ending drug war. The policy makers are so out of touch with what could be deemed as helpful. Which brings me to my second point, in all actuality none of these politicians want to see the drug war get better. Too many people stand to profit from addiction from the privatized prison system all the way on down to the rehab facilities themselves. If you haven't noticed, the United States is building more private facilities to house these so called "CRIMINALS" a large majority of our prison system is occupied by non-violent drug offenders. This country will suffer a harsh consequence if we ever do away with our current policy. Slavery has been banned in this country but not if you look at the prison system as a device to house slaves. in our constitution it clearly states that slavery is abolished, unless you are a prisoner.
Reyno420. : 2010-07-23 04:58:16
LEAP guys are polite people, so this bitch really did a great job promoting their side of the debate. Why strangle humanistic, polite arguments if they dont have som kind of impact. Your prohibitionist reign of terror will soon end Pamela, and it seems like you know
slay : 2010-07-23 02:44:56
theyre still pigs. Fuck em.
Scotto : 2010-07-23 00:42:11
i guess 'disinvited' is a strong term since they weren't really invited in the first place, they just bought a booth. i guess they were actually sort of given a 'forced refund' which isn't quite the same. but you know, 'disinvited' still does sort of capture the flavor of what happened, so i'm sticking with it.
omgoleus : 2010-07-22 23:23:22
At least she admits to being a prohibitionist.

The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.

HOME
COMMENTS
NEWS
ARCHIVE
EDITORS
REVIEW POLICY
SUGGEST A STORY
CREATE AN ACCOUNT
RSS | TWITTER | FACEBOOK
DIGG | REDDIT | SHARE