PayPal
BitCoin
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon
RSS
iTunes

DoseNation Podcast

Weekly news, talk, and interviews. More »

SUGGEST A STORY  |   CREATE AN ACCOUNT  |  
DoseNation.com

Cocaine vaccine?

We've been following the cocaine vaccine story for a while now at DoseNation, but there was a recent press release to announce the first published research results, and they are sadly laughable.

Despite the overall decrease in cocaine use, only 38 percent of the subjects taking the high levels of vaccine achieved sufficient levels of antibodies to prevent the absorption of cocaine into the brain. And of this minority, the functional levels of antibodies were present starting only after two months from the first vaccine and were in decline 16 to 24 weeks into the trial.

Thomas Kosten, a professor in the Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston and a lead study author, is confident that with better vaccine ingredients (theirs used a traditional cholera toxin strengthened with an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant), the vaccine's effectiveness could be improved to as high as 80 percent. In animal trials, he noted, with newer vaccines donated from pharmaceutical companies the researchers found more than four times the amount of antibodies in the rats.

Although the vaccine lessened or negated participants' ability to feel high from the drug, many of the trial participants still consumed cocaine—and at levels far higher than normal. Such so-called "testing," as Kosten noted in the press briefing, was expected and is seen in animal experiments, as well. And even after having warned trial volunteers about the potential dangers of challenging the dosage limits when they couldn't reach an expected high, some showed as much as 10 times the habitual amount of cocaine in their urine until, he said, they likely just ran out of money.

Okay, seriously, WTF? This study shows 38 percent efficacy over an unpredictable one-to-two month window, and even then cocaine use actually increases among many users and becomes more dangerous and financially problematic. And they use cholera toxin? So here's the kicker:

The search for a cocaine vaccine has also revealed that some individuals "seem to be immune to immunization," Kosten said. Like acclimation to a former allergen, he explained, it is possible for "your body [to] think that it's a part of you," and to not allow antibodies to bind to the cocaine molecule.

I would call these results a problem, but others see cause for celebration:

The new findings, which Volkow called "transformative" in the briefing, may ultimately be translatable to other addictive substances, and may pave the way to creating anti-addiction vaccines for other drugs. "We're very enthusiastic about this," Kosten said about this prospect.

Thanks to all the readers who sent links to this story our way.

Posted By jamesk at 2009-10-08 19:54:11 permalink | comments
Facebook it! Twitter it! Digg it! Reddit! StumbleUpon It! Google Bookmark del.icio.us technorati Furl Yahoo! Bookmark
» More ways to bookmark this page


Synchronium : 2009-10-14 09:46:37
Adam, firstly this is a bit late coming, so you probably won't read it, but I'll answer anyway.

What's far more likely (and I think what is meant by "recombinant") is the inactive protein is synthesised in something like yeast by inserting the plasmid of bacterial DNA that codes for the protein into yeast cells. So no, there's no big cholera factory anywhere. :)

Adam : 2009-10-10 01:45:32
Okay well then maybe you'd rather tell me whether or not immunologists are breeding a deadly active cholera virus for a source of big, globular proteins? Cholera can kill you whether or not it's in the needle, and if immunologists are preserving one diseases they are supposed to eradicate, it's kind of missing the point.
Synchronium : 2009-10-09 05:06:35
They actually used "succinylnorcocaine linked to recombinant cholera toxin B-subunit protein", so nothing actually toxic. They just needed a big globular inactive protein onto which they stuck loads of coke molecules. This is necessary as a single molecule of cocaine is too small for antibodies to pick up.

Let's try and avoid the typical "shock, horror!" response when this kind of technique is used all the time.

Adam : 2009-10-09 03:55:47
Yes Primordialstu, they would. But developing such a treatment would SEND THE WRONG MESSAGE. You know, to the children.
And nothing good has to come from anything if we just send the right message, right?

By the way.. "...(theirs used a traditional cholera toxin strengthened with an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant)..."
It's hard to snort coke when you're dead!

primordialstu : 2009-10-08 21:38:48
Who thinks of these things? If you make a drug less effective, users take more. Sheesh. Show them how to get high in better, safer ways, they'll use less of the toxic drug.

The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.

HOME
COMMENTS
NEWS
ARCHIVE
EDITORS
REVIEW POLICY
SUGGEST A STORY
CREATE AN ACCOUNT
RSS | TWITTER | FACEBOOK
DIGG | REDDIT | SHARE