Home | Comments | News | Books | Archive | Contact |
Albert Hofmann: New York Times obituaryNice retrospective. But really, who could say anything bad about Albert?
» more at: www.nytimes.com
Posted By jamesk at 2008-04-30 12:03:30 permalink | comments |
|
The Nadaq would have plummeted and the U.N. would have had to hold special sessions to figure out the implications. Oh, well, do enough acid you will need to figure out plenty of implications.
- Association with the party Alliance of Democratic Left - Polish abbreviation SLD ---> people who still blame postcommunists for everything will ask questions like "Is there any difference between LSD and SLD?" ---> expect answers like "No, both dig holes in your brain".
Or: "Oh, I misread... I was already happy it's the father of SLD who has died"
- Other political associations - usually about 60% of adult Poles don't vote, but nevertheless they are obsessed with politics.
- Somebody has had a bad trip or a relative with drug problems ---> wish Hofmann all the worst and blame him for all drug abuse.
- A "pro-acid" strategy I don't recommend: accuse your opponents of having been brainwashed by Radio Virgin Mary.
- And, typical for all discussions on drug topics in all countries: give examples of drug casualties and call LSD users "junkies".
The phrase "Onet comment" is almost proverbial, it's a symbol of debating on the lowest possible level. Maybe this will let you see why...
The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.