So you want to change your sexual orientation...
The Slog recently hipped us to a pretty wild breakthrough, which the NYT described as "Turning Homosexuality On and Off" in their piece describing the finding:
What if you could take a drug that would quickly alter your sexual orientation from straight to gay, or vice versa?
To their surprise, neurobiologists have discovered that homosexuality can be turned on or off in fruit flies. They’d known that sexual orientation can be genetically programmed, but they didn’t realize it could also be altered by giving a drug that changes the way the flies’ sensory circuits react to pheromones.
Within hours of the treatment, previously heterosexual male fruit flies would be courting other males, and treatment could also cause flies who had been engaging in homosexual behavior to become exclusively heterosexual, the neurobiologists report in Nature Neuroscience. You can read a summary of it here from the University of Illinois at Chicago, the home of one of the researchers, David Featherstone.
Naturally, both the NYT and the Slog (and now us, yay!) go on to ask the ethical question of what should society do with this uncanny new power, should we someday see pills that accomplish this neat trick in humans?
Dan Savage's take:
When we talk about parents attempting to “regulate” their children’s sexual orientations, we’re almost always talking about straight parents wanting to make sure their kids turn out straight. But what about the growing numbers of gay parents out there? Would we be within our rights as parents to chemically alter our children’s sexual orientations? I don’t know a gay parent that would do such a thing, of course. But if this drug becomes available we may have to threaten to give it to our straight kids to prevent bigoted straight parents doing it to their gay kids.
Naturally I'm curious what the DoseNation crowd might think of such societal mayhem...
» More ways to bookmark this page
|
Recently @ DoseNation
|
|
I also believe it's not a good solution to give people all rights at the same time, children are ready for many things while still being too young for others. For example the right to vote - people say children wouldn't understand the parties' programs, but do adults really understand them? Conscious voters are in fact not more than 50% of all adults. (Another solution that seems very interesting for me - we keep 18 as legal voting age, but every person who is at least 14 years old can try passing a test that would prove his or her understanding of how politics work and if s/he does, s/he is allowed to vote despite not being 18.) At the same time I don't think that children should be allowed to try psychoactives without their parents' permission, for me the ideal solution is 18 years minimum to be allowed to buy tobacco or marijuana and 20 years for other psychoactives, including alcohol.
And as for the starting topic - maybe... I'm generally unenthusiastic about "experimentation" in this area. I won't forbid anyone any kind of consensual sex, but I will also never say that having sex with someone you don't love is right.
I clearly believe this is not the parents' right to determine their children's sexual orientation and I generally believe parents should have a bit LESS rights over their children (I would for example support the right to vote and various other rights, including the right to decide about medical treatment, starting from the age of 15 or even less) because nobody can OWN a human being, parents are not owners of their children.
Such a drug is dangerous because there are already pamphlets out there saying that gays want to seduce all young boys and convert them into gays - much in the style of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion". The availability of such a drug could intensify such fears. But I don't think any research on humans will be allowed. It's likely to remain just a curiosity that it's possible to switch sexual orientation in fruit flies - no ethical commitee will allow clinical trials on humans because of possible very negative consequences and because homosexuality is no longer treated as something that should be "cured". Of course some possibility that the drug could "leak" out of the laboratories does exist, but not unless the researchers are committed homophobes.
Let's wait if some urban legends pop out - the government spiking water supply? ;)
The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.