PayPal
BitCoin
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon
RSS
iTunes

DoseNation Podcast

Weekly news, talk, and interviews. More »

SUGGEST A STORY  |   CREATE AN ACCOUNT  |  
DoseNation.com

'Rats and mice get greater protection'

Next time you're thinking to yourself, "Hey, I'll do my part for science and sign up for a clinical trial of a new drug," you might want to consider... well, a couple things, including how much are they paying and will you get high, but also consider this:

In a report due to be released Friday, the inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services, Daniel R. Levinson, said federal health officials did not know how many clinical trials were being conducted, audited fewer than 1 percent of the testing sites and, on the rare occasions when inspectors did appear, generally showed up long after the tests had been completed.

The F.D.A. has 200 inspectors, some of whom audit clinical trials part time, to police an estimated 350,000 testing sites. Even when those inspectors found serious problems in human trials, top drug officials in Washington downgraded their findings 68 percent of the time, the report found. Among the remaining cases, the agency almost never followed up with inspections to determine whether the corrective actions that the agency demanded had occurred, the report found.

“In many ways, rats and mice get greater protection as research subjects in the United States than do humans,” said Arthur L. Caplan, chairman of the department of medical ethics at the University of Pennsylvania.

Nice!

Posted By Scotto at 2007-10-10 09:12:12 permalink | comments
Tags: FDA clinical trials
Facebook it! Twitter it! Digg it! Reddit! StumbleUpon It! Google Bookmark del.icio.us technorati Furl Yahoo! Bookmark
» More ways to bookmark this page


omgoleus : 2007-10-10 18:23:44
I've been working an a human subjects research protocol application and I can tell you that there's much more of a problem here at my university with reasonable research being impeded by ass-covering bureaucratic red tape than there is with abuse of human subjects. The IRB isn't even remotely protecting human subjects; they're protecting the worst sort of American-style liability paranoia, asking all kinds of nitpicky questions and demanding all kinds of nitpicky disclaimers, none of which actually protect the safety of the volunteers in any way. Worse, they change their questions with each succeeding protocol; text that they approve describing a specific procedure in one protocol is heavily criticized for not being detailed enough in the next application... even though it's doing essentially the same thing as the last one...

anyway, I just needed to rant to someone that won't actually get me in trouble for this. :)

silas : 2007-10-10 16:53:35
emphasis on "many ways." In my neuro lab, I'm cutting off rat heads every day for brain research. I sure hope that's not happening to people.

Of course, we give the rats general anesthesia first, so it's not like they're hurting.

Did I mention they also get free cocaine every day? Maybe the rats do have it better after all.

The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.

HOME
COMMENTS
NEWS
ARCHIVE
EDITORS
REVIEW POLICY
SUGGEST A STORY
CREATE AN ACCOUNT
RSS | TWITTER | FACEBOOK
DIGG | REDDIT | SHARE