Patenting cannabinoids?
Reader Kit writes:
This is passing around the net. Its really disturbing to me that the govt is patenting any aspects of a plant's action, but doubly so that it is cannabis, one which they have great need to suppress.
Here's a snippet from the patent summary:
Cannabinoids have been found to have antioxidant properties, unrelated to NMDA receptor antagonism. This new found property makes cannabinoids useful in the treatment and prophylaxis of wide variety of oxidation associated diseases, such as ischemic, age-related, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The cannabinoids are found to have particular application as neuroprotectants, for example in limiting neurological damage following ischemic insults, such as stroke and trauma, or in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and HIV dementia. Nonpsychoactive cannabinoids, such as cannabidoil, are particularly advantageous to use because they avoid toxicity that is encountered with psychoactive cannabinoids at high doses useful in the method of the present invention.
Not sure what it all means. I'm thinking that this patent only applies to the use of cannabinoids as an antioxidant therapy, but maybe I am missing something. Patent law is a bit beyond my expertise.
» More ways to bookmark this page
|
Recently @ DoseNation
|
|
Yes more retardation, I still dont understand how you can patent something that nature already invented, especially something this old=I" The Patenting of cannabinoids refers to new cannabinoids that do not appear naturally in cannibis. Cannabinoids are any substances that are structurally related to tetrahydrocannabinol THC, or that bind to cannabinoid receptors. So these are new chemicals which can be patented.
The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.