PayPal
BitCoin
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon
RSS
iTunes

DoseNation Podcast

Weekly news, talk, and interviews. More »

SUGGEST A STORY  |   CREATE AN ACCOUNT  |  
DoseNation.com

New research on memory-erasing drugs

Neuroscientists have been studying learning and memory for many years. Some studies are done at the systems level, with behavioral tasks, functional neuroimaging, and lesions. Other studies are done at the cellular and molecular level, particularly focusing on the importance of the NMDA receptor in long-term potentiation of synapses, and the importance of DNA transcription and protein synthesis in the growth of new synapses to consolidate memories permanently. At least since the description of Korsakoff's syndrome in the 19th century, it has seemed clear that there is one mechanism for short-term memory, and another mechanism for long-term memory, and some mechanism(s) for transferring from short-term to long-term.

Since some time before the 90s, it has been known that elevated levels of adrenaline strengthen the formation of memories. This seems intuitively obvious, and it has spawned a bunch of clinical interest in possibly preventing PTSD (which I first learned about from Jamesk's post here). This has received quite a bit of media attention. The mechanism essentially involves weakening (though likely not blocking altogether) the transfer of information from short-term to long-term memory, although I don't think the mechanism has been well elucidated yet.

It has been known since at least as far back as the 80s that this transfer process involves transcription and protein synthesis. Also, it has been known that various disruptions (including electroshock) can block this transfer. More surprisingly, it has been observed at least as far back as 1968 that these amnesic treatments could also destroy existing long-term memories if those memories were first recalled into active awareness. This led to a theory called "reconsolidation", which means pretty much what it sounds like. Putting these pieces together, around 2000 it was demonstrated that activating a long-term memory, and then subsequently blocking protein synthesis in the area of the brain associated with the particular memory, caused the memory to disappear. This raises the possibility of Eternal Sunshine-style selective removal of memories

More recent cutting-edge research on the molecular details of memory have raised an astonishing, even shocking memory-hacking possibility. It was found that an enzyme called protein kinase Mzeta is involved in the maintenance of long-term memories. In very recent studies in rats, researchers were able to completely erase long-term memories by infusing a blocker called ZIP into the appropriate area of the rats' brains, even long after the memories had been consolidated and stable. This effect is non-specific; that is, the implication is that they are erasing all of the rats' long-term memories!

Of course, there are a number of glaring questions about these studies. For one, the observation that inhibition of an enzyme can erase a long-term memory seems to contradict the dictum that long-term memories are eventually represented by growth of new synapses. I haven't seen any discussion in the literature yet of how to resolve this. Also, no one would believe that a drug could erase your memory of, say, how to walk, or how to speak English. What would it even mean to erase "all" of your long-term memories? For these rats, they essentially have only one memory: they are born in small, boring cages, they eat the food placed in the cage, drink the water placed in the cage, and then one day are trained with some experimental task. That's the only thing they ever do! They might have memories of miscellaneous tidbits, but nothing of any import either to us or to them, really. The one task they learn does appear to be completely and permanently erased by the infusion. It would be interesting to see what effects this procedure has on subjects with a richer repertoire of memory.

But saying that, I think we're veering rapidly into very questionable ethical territory. Tell me honestly, how many of you aren't wondering at this point what the CIA has done with these chemicals already? Frankly, given the amount of press the beta blockers/PTSD story has received, I'm quite surprised we haven't heard anything about the memory-wipe drug yet in the popular media. I suppose I'm glad, because God knows how inaccurate and misleading the coverage would inevitably be.

Posted By omgoleus at 2008-05-07 22:54:37 permalink | comments
Tags: ltp kinase memory erasing drug anisomycin zip
Facebook it! Twitter it! Digg it! Reddit! StumbleUpon It! Google Bookmark del.icio.us technorati Furl Yahoo! Bookmark
» More ways to bookmark this page


King George of Great Britain. : 2008-05-23 14:50:37
Hi, I been dosed many times by the CIA, Frank Thomas, Mark Fustine, Cheryl Jackson, Benjamin Haskell Novick, Stephanie Marshall, Cherise Kramer Patterson, Mr Ferguson. They have destroyed my life and now in may of 2008 they want to dose me again because of the knowledge and awareness of their secrets like Cloning and the secret military base in Los Angles. Please help me
King George
Brandon : 2008-05-13 19:46:05
salesmen have always sold belief and value systems along with material possessions. back in the day psychological manipulation was called charisma.

I don't blame the salesmen as much as the buyers. problem is just about everyone is a buyer of some sort of culture, belief system, what have you.

These new drugs and all drugs and all technology magnify our abilities - with that will come both heaven and hell.

omgoleus : 2008-05-10 16:19:17
How is it possible, indeed? Maybe because somebody(s) did it on purpose for their own profit? zupak, have you heard of Edward Bernays? Wikipedia says:

Edward Louis Bernays (November 22, 1891 – March 9, 1995) is considered one of the fathers of the field of public relations along with Ivy Lee. Combining the ideas of Gustave Le Bon and Wilfred Trotter on crowd psychology with the psychoanalytical ideas of his uncle, Sigmund Freud, Bernays was one of the first to attempt to manipulate public opinion using the psychology of the subconscious.
He felt this manipulation was necessary in society, which he regarded as irrational and dangerous as a result of the 'herd instinct' that Trotter had described. Adam Curtis's award-winning 2002 documentary for the BBC, The Century of the Self, pinpoints Bernays as the originator of modern public relations....

Bernays' vision was of a utopian society in which the dangerous libidinal energies that lurked just below the surface of every individual could be harnessed and channeled by a corporate elite for economic benefit. Through the use of mass production, big business could fulfill constant craving of the inherently irrational and desire driven masses, simultaneously securing the niche of a mass production economy (even in peacetime), as well as sating the dangerous animal urges that threatened to tear society apart if left unquelled.

Bernays' magisterial, philosophical touch is in evidence in Manipulating Public Opinion (1928) when he writes: "This is an age of mass production. In the mass production of materials a broad technique has been developed and applied to their distribution. In this age, too, there must be a technique for the mass distribution of ideas."...

zupakomputer. : 2008-05-10 10:30:44
But how can they not know that, when but a few generations previously, it was unthinkable to not be aware of such a thing?

Just one example: it's only been a couple of generations in the UK when it's ceased to be common knowledge how to grow your own food properly and collect seeds for next years planting etc. But now it's something lost to most minds, or to some that catch-on they just incorporate it into their commercial bandwagon-jumping standardisation of all things eco.

How is it possible that hundreds of thousands of years of human knowledge being passed successfully on can be gone in a matter of about 50 years - that is the most interesting question of all. I don't think any sane natural answers can be arrived at, not if you're being really honest about what happened. That many people would never all become that insane and out of touch with reality at the same time, not naturally.

Waldemar. : 2008-05-08 19:46:54
What were we talking about?
Brandon : 2008-05-08 16:02:02
Have no doubt, whatsoever, that mind interfacing drugs will soon be multiplying in number. The molecular complexity of the brain is starting to be comprehended and correlated with aspects of the mind. Current psychoactive drugs have a wide variety of targets in the brain - even if it's one type of receptor it will have different functions in different brain areas, and therefore different aspects of mind.

When we get targeted drug formulations (and we will), I hope that we as a society as humanity will learn more about our own minds from them.

omgoleus : 2008-05-08 09:23:43
I agree with most of what you say, z, but none of it contradicts my main point, which is that this memory-erasing-drug business in both extremely interesting, and some seriously scary shit. :)

As for the researchers, there are a few sickos like you describe, but it's much more likely to find them among the technicians than among the scientists. The vast, vast majority of scientists are very progressive-minded people who are very compassionate about human suffering and/or very curious about how the universe works and have entirely positive motivations. As the Buddha pointed out, the suffering arises because of ignorance: They do not, in fact, "know damn well" that none of that is needed to understand how to cure anything. Seriously, ask yourself, how many average Americans really do know how important balanced, sustainable living in harmony with nature truly is for physical and mental health? Almost none, right? That is the problem. People don't know that, and so even though their intentions are good they cause problems by focusing their efforts in the wrong places.

Trust me on this. :)

zupakomputer. : 2008-05-08 05:58:29
It's also known that you need none of that and can cure anything with the correct waves of energy, plants, and some types of surgery.

"it has seemed clear that there is one mechanism for short-term memory, and another mechanism for long-term memory, and some mechanism(s) for transferring from short-term to long-term."

Yar, it's called RAM for short-term, and ROM for long-term. And the transference, that's known as the bus. You forgot BIOS.

Seriously, the biosciences and medicine are a total mess. More than any other science they build upon nothing whatsoever known about health and medicine that has worked all along, and the overall failure to notice the correlation between a decline in naturalness in general and a huge rise in diseases and new types of viruses goes all the further to proving that true.
Take the 'black death' - why did it spread / exist to begin with: because people did totally un-natural things with their waste & excrement) in concentrated areas, where they also lived and worked.
They packed themselves into paved areas and threw their shit and piss out into the street.
And what do most of our infrastructures do with it now? They do the same, except they put it into pipes underground instead, and then add poisons to it, then dump it back in the land or sea or rivers.

Which is odd, cause when they lived out in nature they knew to bury it in the ground properly. Composting.

And many of the biosciences people are just sickos that want to do tests on animals and fetuses. They know damn well none of that is needed to understand how to cure anything.

The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.

HOME
COMMENTS
NEWS
ARCHIVE
EDITORS
REVIEW POLICY
SUGGEST A STORY
CREATE AN ACCOUNT
RSS | TWITTER | FACEBOOK
DIGG | REDDIT | SHARE