PayPal
BitCoin
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon
RSS
iTunes

DoseNation Podcast

Weekly news, talk, and interviews. More »

SUGGEST A STORY  |   CREATE AN ACCOUNT  |  
DoseNation.com

UK universities asked to start testing for smart drugs

Universities must investigate measures, including random dope testing, to tackle the increasing use of cognitive enhancment drugs by students for exams, a leading behavioural neuro-scientist warns.

Student use of drugs, such as Ritalin and modafinil, available over the internet and used to increase the brain's alertness, had "enormous implications for universities", said Barbara Sahakian, a professor of clinical neuropsychology at Cambridge University's psychiatry department.

Normally prescribed for neurological disorders including Alzheimer's disease, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and narcolepsy, such drugs boost acetylcholine in the brain, improving alertness and attention. Their use has prompted concerns that they could give students an unfair advantage. "This is something that universities really have to discuss. They should have some strategy, some kind of active policy," Sahakian said.

"The coercion aspect is a strong one. Some students say they feel it is cheating, and it puts pressure on them to feel they have to use these drugs when they don't really want to."

Sahakian, whose work is at the forefront of research on the effects of such drugs on healthy people, said urgent debate was now needed on the ethics of how society dealt with "smart drugs".

Posted By jamesk at 2010-02-21 14:23:26 permalink | comments
Facebook it! Twitter it! Digg it! Reddit! StumbleUpon It! Google Bookmark del.icio.us technorati Furl Yahoo! Bookmark
» More ways to bookmark this page


Richard. : 2010-12-31 16:09:42
I won't take a job that requires they regulate my drug choices. I won't allow an educator to choose for me. The ethic position of coercion stated here indicates that, yes, comparison is all important here just like sport, so the playing field must be level.

It's bull. You are at uni to learn. That's it. No matter how much you like other students you are not there to compete. You are there to get your knowledge and skills.

So if I choose to take modafinil to allow easier working, more productive days, then I will NOT obey some asshole rule about not using this, any more than I would limit my caffeine if caffeine helped me get my exam results. I still have to work just as hard-I am simply able to work longer through less fog.

Can we PLEASE for the love of god, get away from regulating every tiny piece of human behaviour? As long as I'm not doing a safety critical task, lay OFF what poisons/nutrients I choose to use.

psypressuk : 2010-02-26 14:45:31
Another method of regulating the individual. Not impressed. Won't be taking any dope tests. x
Nowhere Girl. : 2010-02-23 15:34:28
She, she, not he...
Anonymous. : 2010-02-22 14:37:01
The quote and the researcher's position seems reasonable, with one glaring exception.

On one hand he warns that (academic) society needs to start thinking about these things and their implications, which seems a reasonable position. We do need to start considering these things. We need to start having a debate about just what it means to be human, in the face of drugs and technology that can tweak or even change that very definition. But then he says:

" Universities must investigate measures, including random dope testing, to tackle the increasing use of cognitive enhancement drugs by students for exams."

Which presupposes what the outcome of that discussion will be. How can we truly engage in that debate in an intelligent way if we already know what the right answer is?

I think perhaps he needs to sample some of those drugs he researches.

The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.

HOME
COMMENTS
NEWS
ARCHIVE
EDITORS
REVIEW POLICY
SUGGEST A STORY
CREATE AN ACCOUNT
RSS | TWITTER | FACEBOOK
DIGG | REDDIT | SHARE