PayPal
BitCoin
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon
RSS
iTunes

DoseNation Podcast

Weekly news, talk, and interviews. More »

SUGGEST A STORY  |   CREATE AN ACCOUNT  |  
DoseNation.com

Earth's Brain, Akashic Records and Paranormal Imprints

A neural network and the universe. Can you tell them apart?
I typically don't give much thought to universal mind theories unless they have some solution to the way such a large brain might store and send information in physical energy networks. This is such a theory.

The visible galaxies in the universe are not isolated and disconnected but are interwoven by a filamentary web-like structure - which is the invisible dark matter scaffolding of the universe. The web-like structure is both a signature feature of invisible dark matter and magnetic plasma. The appearance of this web bears an uncanny resemblance to a cross-section of the brain. (Refer: Brain vs Universe)

But it is not only the morphology (i.e. structural aspects) of the large scale structure of the universe which is similar to the human brain but also the physiology (i.e. the functions). These filaments carry currents of charged particles (ions) over large distances that generate magnetic fields - similar to a nerve fiber. And they form circuits, just like the neural circuits in the brain.

The high degree of connectivity is what sets the brain apart from an ordinary computer. Connectivity is also apparent in the cosmic web. Galaxies are formed when filaments pinch or cross each other. A nexus of filaments (including thousands of tiny filamentary currents) will provide the connectivity for the transfer of not only energy but information from one galactic nucleus to another.

The author, Jay Alfred, then ties this networked universe theory into mystical concepts like the Akashic field, the collective unconscious, and a global brain.

The Earth appears to have a brain but how does it get sensory inputs? One way is to generate life-forms. The myriad of life-forms (including human beings) on Earth are in fact the many eyes and ears of the Earth. The networks of currents in the brains of life-forms are an integral part of the network of currents in Earth's brain. It is in the universe's interest to generate life-forms so that it can see, hear, taste, touch and smell and become aware of itself.

If we are indeed connected to the Earth's brain, which is connected to a universal brain, it also means that we share a universal brain which can have contact with the brains of other planets that nurture life-forms that generate their own memories. Intelligent life-forms can send information (either intentionally or unintentionally) via the universal brain directly to our brains.

This is not entirely new stuff, but it is probably the most succinct argument for collective consciousness I have seen.

Thanks to Boris for finding this!

Posted By jamesk at 2009-11-12 12:29:35 permalink | comments
Facebook it! Twitter it! Digg it! Reddit! StumbleUpon It! Google Bookmark del.icio.us technorati Furl Yahoo! Bookmark
» More ways to bookmark this page


Sensei. : 2009-11-19 04:09:42
Yes, this reinforces the holographic structure of all things. It reiterates the presence of the center and its radiating arms so similar to everything spiral, helical and electromagnetic.
Sean. : 2009-11-14 10:05:37
Wow, fantastic article, thanks!

I'm pretty certain that anyone's perspective is only ever going to be part of the whole story. Sit back and disagree or step up and agree - it'll still only ever be part of but never the whole.

wystri. : 2009-11-14 01:09:59
just to be clear, that was not at all meant to be a diss to synchronium personally. i really do get his point.

i was simply pointing out that everyone makes assumptions and that they are all equally silly considering how much of this universe we know absolutely nothing about. in fact, sometimes i think that we know so little that it throws everything we think is known and proven into serious question. when you think about how science itself has morphed over the years, i am inclined to think that there are huge gaping holes in all the scientific "conclusions" we have come to as well. i do consider science useful and interesting, but not by no means concrete. reality is far too shifty to be accurately measured.

besides, heehee...i happen to like the word "myriad" :P

guest : 2009-11-13 18:56:28
@ guest

save it for youtube

guest : 2009-11-13 11:06:10
@ wystri

i commend you brother...wise words well spoken across the ether to the brain of another looking deep into a screen that cant been seen without electricity

Actaeon. : 2009-11-13 02:15:24
I'ma guess Synchronium was joking, his blog has a sense of humour. Plus to a Brit, myriad probably still means "ten thousand."
wystri. : 2009-11-12 22:08:32
well, i don't know if it would hold water or not, but i still think it's a pretty neat theory, and i for one enjoy entertaining such thoughts.

synchromnium: i get what you're saying. however, to assume something is wrong just because it "feels" right" is no better than assuming it's right.

nor is it wise to assume that someone who uses a specific phrase "can't be correct about most things". that's just arrogance and prejudice.

although, you may be right, if only in the sense that nobody is correct about most things, and anyone who says they are is either mistaken or lying.

emer. : 2009-11-12 21:46:41
About contact using the brain as interface, there's a great book:
[link]
The conclusion of all the speculation of the authors is kind of: Yes, they appear to make contact trough psychedelics, and this is the only "real" contact
adam. : 2009-11-12 18:30:20
has anyone else been saying this since they were nine years old?
Synchronium.net. : 2009-11-12 17:24:48
Jahmez: It used to "feel right" to assume illness came from angry gods. Then science proved to us time and time again that what "feels right" is often bollocks. Unfortunately, without evidence (or even testable predictions arising from the hypothesis), it's worthless.

Also, anyone that says "myriad of" can't be correct about most things.

Jahmez. : 2009-11-12 15:11:23
i'm always torn about this kinda stuff. there isn't much scientific proof, but it feels right ya know. matter has organized itself at greater and greater levels of complexity on smaller and smaller scales but the forms of these organizations have a lot of repeated elements. thanks for posting this.
A Nonny Mouse. : 2009-11-12 14:39:15
There are a few problems with this:
a) Dark matter hasn't been proven to exist, and this hypothesis is probably on it's way out.
b) Neither do filaments that carry ions across the universe
c) Neural circuitry is a simple analogy to explain how the brain works, however our 'circuitry' doesn't really work like a real electric circuit (using chemicals along with exlectricity, not forming closed loops, etc.)
Willy. : 2009-11-12 13:28:47
This is incredibly important stuff. The field is real.

The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.

HOME
COMMENTS
NEWS
ARCHIVE
EDITORS
REVIEW POLICY
SUGGEST A STORY
CREATE AN ACCOUNT
RSS | TWITTER | FACEBOOK
DIGG | REDDIT | SHARE